Google – THE VOCALIST MAGAZINE https://www.vocalistmag.com VOCALIST NETWORK Sat, 02 Apr 2022 17:37:29 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://i0.wp.com/www.vocalistmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/cropped-Logo-Vocalist-512-X-512.webp?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Google – THE VOCALIST MAGAZINE https://www.vocalistmag.com 32 32 60961036 Best Vocal Mics 2022 for Pro Quality Studio Recording https://www.vocalistmag.com/mobile-google-ceo-promises-11-daydream-compatible-phones/ Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:09:15 +0000 http://www.mvpthemes.com/zoxnews/?p=393 There are so many options, all sorts of different types and they all look fairly similar and yet vary enormously in price. Scrolling through the options on a website can be mind-boggling. But don’t worry, I’ve distilled the choices down to a handful that I’d recommend looking at depending on your budget. There’s no point drooling over a $1,000 microphone if you only have a couple of hundred to spend. ]]>

But whatever your budget all of these options will do a good job of recording your voice and bringing it into your music. And don’t forget your popper-stopper (if you don’t know what that is I’ll tell you at the end).

The best vocal mics available in 2022 (so far) are:

  • Audio-Technica AT2020
  • Shure SM58
  • Behringer SL 84C
  • Rode NT2-A
  • Shure SM7B
  • Lewitt LCT 440 Pure
  • Warm Audio WA-251
  • Neumann TLM 102

Frequently Asked Questions About the Best Vocal Mics

 

What is the best professional vocal microphone?

 
Robin Vincent

The Shure SM7B is the best microphone for getting professional results in any given situation. It’s robust yet sensitive, is great to work with and gives a passionately intimate sound that outs everything down on the track. For both singing and speaking roles, the SM7B is perfect.

What mic do most Singers use?

 
Robin Vincent

For live performance, you are commonly going to find the Shure SM58 as the microphone of choice. It can handle anything your want to throw at it including being spun around your head on the cable and thrown into the bass bins. It’s the hardest working mic in the business.

What microphones make your voice sound better?

 
Robin Vincent

For capturing the best your voice can offer you’ll need a condenser microphone and a very quiet room. The Warm Audio WA-251 is perfect for this as it will record a great raw performance that you can process to great effect in your DAW or recording software.

 

 

Under $100

You’ve got to be kidding right? A studio microphone for under $100? Oh yes, there are loads of great budget microphones out there at the moment that will do a decent job of converting vocals into signals. And not just the cheaper dynamic mics, there are some decent condenser ones too. Check these out.

Audio-Technica AT2020

Audio-Technica AT2020

Condenser microphones are considered to be the best choice for vocal recording. The large diaphragm responds sensitively to the changes in pressure from a vocal performance. They used to be expensive and many of them still are but in recent times the prices have come down within reach of home and project studios while retaining enough quality to make for surprisingly good recordings. The Audio-Technica AT2020 is one such condenser microphone.

For under $100, you’d expect it to be a light-weight plastic affair but the AT2020 is constructed from metal and has a certain amount of ruggedness about it. It has the wide dynamic range that we love about condenser mics and a cardioid polar pattern that reduces the pickup of sounds from the sides and rear.

One of the downsides of condenser mics is their proclivity for picking up environmental sounds — this is where the vocal booth starts to become a necessity. But the AT2020 could perform well in a quiet space without needing total isolation.

The AT2020 is well constructed and made from metal and manages to feel rugged. It can handle a wide dynamic range and because of the cardioid polar pattern, it’s unidirectional so it only picks up sound from the front, minimizing the pickup of accidental sounds from the sides or rear. The sensitivity of a condenser mic can become a problem with picking up sounds around you. You do have to consider your recording environment and the potential for background noise but in a quiet space, the AT2020 is ideal.

It comes with a microphone stand mount, which is simpler than the usual shock mounts, just be careful not to knock the stand. The AT2020 is a remarkable microphone for the price.

Pros & Cons

  • Great value
  • Large diaphragm
  • Metal construction
  • Wide dynamic range
  • Cardioid polar pattern
  • Needs a quiet space
  • Lightweight

 Street Price: $99
 audio-technica.com

Shure SM58

Shure SM58

The SM58 is a classic microphone that you would have seen on stages all over the world. It’s the descendent of the first microphone to feature the familiar ball shaped grill but the SM58 is designed to improve upon the feedback and handling issues of its predecessor. It has become the biggest selling microphone on the planet, it feels good to hold, it’s rugged enough to survive the rigors of energetic live performance and yet is surprisingly useful in the studio.

The SM58 is a dynamic microphone and so not as sensitive to background noise as a condenser. It also requires no powering or additional equipment. It has a uniform cardioid pattern, meaning that it’s focused at the front and cuts down on background noise by isolating the main sound source. It’s going to work great in a larger range of environments like a home studio, garage, or kitchen.

Simple, legendary, and fantastic value at $99. You can get them colored these days but please don’t do that.

Pros & Cons

  • Classic mic
  • Rugged
  • Easy to use
  • Plug and go
  • Good with background noise
  • Not as sensitive as condenser mics
  • Narrow dynamic range

 Street Price: $99
 shure.com

Behringer SL 84C

Behringer SL 84C microphone on white background

It’s impossible to talk about cheap microphones without mentioning Behringer. They’ve recently released a couple of what are essentially SM58 clones. They are designed to look and work like the famous Shure microphone but for a fraction of the cost.
 
They are remarkably similar in terms of looks and from a stage, it would look like you’re using an SM58. It has a good, balanced XLR connection, integrated pop shield and even comes with a mic stand clip.
 
The sound is decent, it handles feedback reasonably well and if you have no money and need a basic vocal mic then the SL 84C will fill that role. For a few more dollars the Behringer BA 85A clone of the Sure Beta 58 would be slightly better but neither quite stand up to the good old SM58 in terms of sound or build quality.

Pros & Cons

  • Ridiculously cheap
  • Feels good for the money
  • Sounds better than you’d think
  • Doesn’t feel as trustworthy as an SM58
  • But at this price it’s amazing

 Street Price: $12.99
 behringer.com

Under $500

This is where the choices start to heat up. You’ll find professionally quality wrapped up in satisfying build quality where you know you can’t go far wrong.

Rode NT2-A

Rode NT2-A

The Rode NT2-A manages to evoke the feel of a classic studio microphone while being able to produce a thoroughly modern sound. It’s a professional, large capsule condenser with a variable pick-up pattern and built-in high-pass filter and -10dB or -5dB pad. These things make very versatile from smooth whispers to screaming protests.

Inside is an Australian designed TYPE HF1 dual diaphragm, gold-sputtered capsule. The frequency and transient response have been carefully engineered to match up to modern recording techniques while giving off the warm vibes of classic microphones.

It has a wide dynamic range, a 3-way switch for different polar patterns, 2 high-pass filter options and 2 pads. It feels weighty and solid with a heat-treated steel mesh head and satin nickel finish. The capsule has an internal shock mount but it also comes with a shock mount for a mic stand, cable and dust cover.

The NT2-A is brilliantly versatile, robust and classy. If you can only buy one microphone then the NT2-A is an excellent choice.

Pros & Cons

  • Classic sound and looks
  • Versatile polar patterns
  • Wide range of uses
  • Modern technology
  • Needs a quiet room
  • Can be a bit bright

 Street Price: $399
 rode.com

Shure SM7B

Shure SM7B

The SM7B has become a modern legend. It seems to appear in everyone’s videos, Tik-Toks and Inst Reels. It’s hanging there at an angle at what looks like too close to the face as if the singer is about to chew on it. It’s a distinctive microphone.

The reason you have to get up close and personal with it is because it’s a dynamic microphone and is designed for close mic-ing. It’s not like the condensor microphones that you expect to find in studios where you stand a foot away singing into a popper stopper. But this is the type of dynamic mic that’s going to give you a great vocal sound while not being sensitive enough to pickup all the background noise, shuffling and noise from the environment that can be a problem with condensers. It hits that sweet spot that’s ideal for people with studios that aren’t exactly sound proof.

The SM7B has a flat wide-range frequency response with controls for bass roll-off and midrange emphasis and has a classic cardioid polar pattern for excellent off-axis rejection. It’s encased with its own electromagnetic shielding, internal air suspension and pop filter. Being dynamic means it doesn’t need phantom power or special cabling; it will plug into anything.

It may have been originally designed as a mic for broadcast and dialogue but it’s become a favorite with Singers and Producers alike.

Pros & Cons

  • Does everything and you see it everywhere
  • Superb vocal mic
  • Best dynamic mic in the business
  • Great for live streaming
  • A bit chunky
  • Not as sensitive as condenser mics

 Street Prices:
• Shure SM7B – $399
 shure.com

Lewitt LCT 440 Pure

Lewitt LCT 440 Pure

Here’s an award-winning microphone from Austrian audiophiles Lewitt, taking the components and capsule from their high-end prestige models and cramming it into a more cost-effective, compact yet stylish enclosure. It’s not vintage-looking like so many others in this list, instead, the focus is all on the function, all on the sound and delivering a beautifully balanced and brilliantly clear recording.

The cardioid pattern ensures a focused, low noise response with a satisfying dynamic range and ability to find the sweet spot in any application. Perfectly at home with vocals, it’s also great with guitars, cabinets, instruments, and groups.

The included shock mount and pop shield keep it out of harm’s way and the unfussy enclosure looks nowhere near as dainty or fragile as the others sub-$500 offerings. The LCT 440 Pure would be great with everything. There’s a step-up version called the LCT 540S, which offers a more balanced tone over the entire spectrum and effortless clarity.

Pros & Cons

  • High-end capsule in an affordable package
  • Focused, low noise response
  • Brilliantly clear recordings
  • Very versatile and robust
  • Needs a quiet room

 Street Prices:
• Lewitt LCT 440 Pure – $269
• Lewitt LCT 540 s Pure – $699
 lewitt-audio.com

Under $1,000

Now we’re talking. No need to look for budget versions of great microphones, with $1,000 to spend you can simply buy a great microphone.

Warm Audio WA-251

Warm Audio WA-251

Warm Audio has made a name for themselves building affordable replicas of rare and expensive vintage gear. With the WA-251 they are taking on the legendary Telefunken ELA M 251 which first became popular in the 1960s. The currently available reissued “E” version costs around $9,500, the WA-251 will set you back only $799.

Warm Audio doesn’t claim to have built a clone of the original but rather they based their designs on following the sound and technology as closely as possible. Their capsule is all-brass, edge-terminated that gives all the sonic richness of the original CK12 capsule. The housing is all brass, the diaphragm is 24k gold sputtered 6 micron.

It uses a CineMag USA transformer and a Slovak Republic JJ 12AY7 vacuum tube. There are carefully chosen Wima, Solen French and Polystyrene capacitors and thoughtfully selected Gotham 5 meter GAC-7, 7-pin tube microphone cable.

By all accounts, the WA-251 sounds fantastic, picking up an Editor’s Choice award at the 2019 NAMM show. Quite how they achieve such a gorgeous-sounding microphone is a credit to the intense scrutiny that Warm Audio put into developing their products. Like with any tube-based microphone you do have to put up with the chunky power supply but it all comes in a nice wooden box with a shock mount and it even looks exactly like it should.

Pros & Cons

  • Amazing take on a legendary mic
  • Classic looks
  • Rich, meaty tube sound
  • Very precisely engineered
  • Incredible for the price
  • Needs careful handling
  • Requires special powering

 Street Price: $799
 warmaudio.com

Neumann TLM 102

Neumann TLM 102

Neumann had to turn up at some point. This famous microphone brand is found in studios the world over. The TLM 102 is compact and unimpressive to look at but beneath that red badge you know there’s something a bit special. It excels at vocals, bringing a sweetness to the party with low noise and high clarity.

There’s a slight boost designed into this microphone after around 6kHz to add presence and focus to the voice as it stands in the mix. Neumann also suggests the diminutive size makes it easier for you to see the vocalist at work and keep connected.

The specs don’t make it stand out from the crowd; many cheaper mics have similar numbers but you just know that having a Neumann in your studio is going to elevate your work.

Pros & Cons

  • The biggest name in microphones
  • Great price for this quality and reputation
  • Excellent sweet spots
  • Low noise and high clarity
  • Designed expressly for vocals
  • You can probably get a similar sound with a cheaper option

 Street Price: $699
 neumann.com

Over $1,000

If you have a large budget for a single microphone then I would recommend spending some time at a music store trying some out and taking advice from professionals and studios in your area. You could be looking at a proper Neumann U87 microphone, the gorgeously retro Blue Microphone Bottle range, the workhorse AKG C414, or the sublime Earthworks SV33.

But at this level, you need to consider your environment. How good is your recording space? How well insulated and treated for audio? What preamps are you going into and how will it be recorded? Without these things in place then the advantages of a high-end microphone will be somewhat lost in the signal chain.

Conclusion

We have some great options available to us. You can’t go far wrong with an AT2020 or SM58 if you are starting out. But for a few hundred dollars you could be using the same mic as everyone else in the Shure SM7B or get super adaptable with the Rode NT2-A.

Pop shield for recording vocals against white backgroundBut the most important thing will be your vocal performance and a popper stopper. What’s a popper stopper? Originally made from a pair of women’s pantyhose stretched over a coat hanger these circular pop shields prevent plosives from P and B sounds from impacting the microphone. An absolutely vital piece of studio equipment for vocals whether the microphone claims to have it built-in or not.

Pop Shield/Filter/Blocker/Stopper/Screen

Street Prices:
• Generic Popper Stopper: $17
• Neumann Popper Stopper: up to $99

]]>
393
Micah Plissner https://www.vocalistmag.com/hulu-hires-google-marketing-veteran-kelly-campbell-as-cmo/ Tue, 25 Jul 2017 01:52:11 +0000 http://www.mvpthemes.com/zoxnews/?p=349 In Micah Plissner’s 25-year career as a vocal coach, his clients have included singers like Sean “Diddy” Combs, the Katy Perry Band, Rufus Wainright or even television shows such as American Idol and Glee.]]>

TVM: Let’s go back to the beginning; when can you first remember being struck by a

vocalist? Who was your favourite as a child maybe?

MP: That’s a great question! I grew up in New York City in the 60’s and everything that

was popular at that time was R&B, there was no rock. All you heard on the radio was The

Temptations, Marvin Gaye, Diana Ross, you know? So it was everybody in that genre.

You could almost take anybody that was popular in the early 60’s or mid 60’s who was in

R&B and they were blowing my mind.

TVM: So did you want to be a vocalist initially?

MP: I wanted to be a singer as long as I can remember; I did my first gig when I was

three years old on stage you know? And it was in the papers; I’m from New York City so

you know it was like in Central Park. It was crazy, I was such a young child but I loved

being on stage.

TVM: When and how did you get into teaching it though?

MP: I got into teaching because as I got older, especially in the late 70’s and early 80’s, I

really got into punk rock, you know? There were a lot of punk bands and I really loved

that whole thing. And as time went on in the 80’s, punk sort of morphed into metal and

then some of that was while I was into death metal and really heavy kind of stuff. The

L.A. kind of punk was fading out. In about ‘87 all these kinds of rockers were coming

into our territory and I was like what the f—- is going on here? Who are these people?

But one thing that most intensely struck me about these bands was because even though I

didn’t care for their music, I had never seen so many beautiful women in a room in my

life. That made a big impression on a young man [laughs] so I decided it might be a good

idea to start singing in some of these bands. Little did I know that I ended up being

signed. And all these labels started seeing me as a rocker guy, but really I just wanted to

party. So I fell ass backwards into these deals because people wanted me to sing. And it

hit me that I had to put out records where I had to sing this crap.

TVM: So after that you…

MP: Well, fortunately the record executives at the time let me out of my deal; they could

see that I wasn’t the guy that anyone thought I was. So I wanted to just continue on doing

indie and punk rock, but then all these rockers wanted me to sing for these bands, some

pretty famous ones and I was like oh hell no, I’m not going to go on the road with these

guys. I mean I liked them, they’re all fun, but I couldn’t imagine being on a bus travelling

with them, so I said let’s make it easy, I’ll teach you how to sing, you become the singer

and that’s it, you don’t have to worry about getting a singer. A lot of guitar players would

come up to me and ask me to sing, but I’d say why don’t you sing and I’ll teach you?

And believe it or not next thing I know these people are signed and people are calling me

out of nowhere going hey can you teach me how to sing and I’m going what? At first I

wasn’t into it and then they went, no I’ll pay you! And I said how much? And they said

$25 for an hour and I went oh my god! To make a long story short, because I knew so

many people, I actually started getting good at what I was doing and developed my own

method; I’ve even taken from a few good vocal coaches.

TVM: Getting to your method though; how strict are you with your client; in the terms of

keeping their voice healthy and able to continue singing? What exercises do they go

through?

MP: 90% of the reason why people lose their voice on the road; because I work with a lot

of bands that are on the road, is fatigue and partying too much and talking too much. And

not taking care of themselves on just a basic fundamental level; just drinking and partying

too much is probably the most common reason. People aren’t going to say that, but that’s

what’s happening. The other thing, and the thing that I deal with besides that since I can’t

control what people do, and I tell them, please take care of yourself in every way

possible, drink water, don’t drink too much, and don’t talk too much, if you talk all day

and all night while you’re doing five shows a week. But the thing I notice as far as

technique-wise, the biggest problem I see people have both professionally and nonprofessionally

is just a lack of having really a definite, consistent idea of what breathing

can do and the kind they need to support their voices.

TVM: Are these mistakes you see a lot of your old and young clients do?

MP: What do you mean by old clients?

TMV: I mean people who have a little more experience in the business, and opposed to

newer, up and comers.

MP: It’s so funny you say that because I was just thinking to myself, who do I have that’s

old anymore? Everybody I work with is fairly young; there’s definitely nobody near my

age that I work with. But no, I see this almost with everybody; anyone who comes in I

feel has either been taught wrong about breathing or doesn’t do it well enough or doesn’t

do it consistently enough or doesn’t even think about it. Even the professionals who

know what they’re doing, their problem is consistency; they know how to breathe but

over time these lose it. But that’s when you become a vocal coach; you’re really that

coach that doesn’t let people slide, it’s very much like being an athletic coach.

TVM: At what point does an artist break away from their vocal coach? Is it ever an ego

thing?

MP: No, I’ve never experienced an ego thing, there’s just sort of a reality. I always say

I’m trying to work my way out of a job; once an act gets signed that I’m working with,

then they’re going in the studio, then they’re going on tour and then I’m not going to see

them until they’re back in town and stuff like that so I don’t really feel like, at least in

L.A. Though there are some people who may not be as public about having a vocal

coach, definitely that’s true, but that’s now what’s really happening in the background.

They’re definitely very happy to have someone help them with the most important thing

in their life that’s making them money, you know?

TVM: Some believe they don’t need vocal training, but even for the “born talents” why

should they see someone like you?

MP: It depends, I agree with that, some people are born talented but there’s a difference

between being talented and working as a professional, you know? When we hear you and

go “oh my god you have a great voice” you know, let’s say they do a 40-minute set once

a month, well that’s one thing, but let’s see six nights a week, three sets or you’re

travelling all over the world; then it becomes more about vocal health than vocal training

so that you can handle the load because it’s very intense on a performer to be on the road

for a long period of time. It’s very difficult physically, mentally, in every way to always

be at your best. So even if you have a lot of talent, I have to now build you up so you can

last through a long tour; I Skype with people just to keep them in shape.

TVM: What are your thoughts on modern voice modulation; auto-tune, etc?

MP: I guess I really don’t care about it that much; like it’s just sort of part of reality. A

lot of the time when there’s leaps in technology, I don’t really argue with it, it’s just

that’s what’s going on. There are people who are real singers, and then there are people

who are performers. I think auto-tune because you can’t sing is you not being able to

sing. And auto-tune because you’re the producer or you’re just trying to get stuff done or

a touch up here or there is fine, but if you’re using auto-tune because your singer cannot

stay on pitch, then you don’t have a singer; you’re fabricating one.

Some producers I know use auto-tune on great singers just to get that little bit of buzz

that people are used to; that sound of auto-tune, even if it’s not correcting the pitch. They

just like it as an effect; it really has nothing to do with the singer’s ability.

TVM: We’re currently having this conversation over Skype, and you mentioned you also

give lessons over it. Can you talk about that experience and how it benefits or doesn’t the

voice?

MP: I do a lot of Skype lessons, but to be honest with you, a lot of the times because I

Skype internationally and nationally, since I’m a Los Angeles industry vocal coach,

there’s also other guys here, guys in New York, guys in Nashville. The guys who are the

best of us are going to be wherever it’s happening because that’s where the business is; I

mean I probably do 30-40 lessons a week here. If you’re living somewhere that doesn’t

have this quality of vocal lessons from teachers, you’re going to get a lot more from a

voice lesson on Skype from a good coach then taking somebody who’s regional to you

who really isn’t as strong as we are. Also, you have to understand that people like us are

very tied in with the music industry, so we kind of know what’s going on before

something’s even happening so we also benefit people in being that counsellor kind of

role, someone who consult about what’s happening in the market-place that can help

singers too that someone not in L.A. might not know what’s going on.

TVM: You live in Los Angeles, but how has the industry varied in different cities you’ve

been to?

MP: That’s a really good question; I’d say Los Angeles is where contracts get signed. It’s

a production town, like this is a place where records get made. This is where all the labels

are; this is the music business and production heart. There’s stuff in New York, but not as

much here; I get so many people coming from New York to here all the time; producers,

famous artists. I never hear of anybody in L.A. going to New York very often. I never

hear anyone say “Oh, I need to go to New York to fill in the blank”.

But like in Nashville, it seems like a songwriter’s town. There are definitely producers,

but there’s a whole different culture of song-writing there, people collaborate a whole lot

more on songs. That’s kind of changing here; the issue though is that most of the lawsuits

in music are over song-writing, whereas in Nashville people seem to not give a damn;

they’re like “Hey, let’s just get together and write!” There’s a new generation of people

coming together, and I like that.

TVM: I’m curious too, because I’m from Canada and this magazine is based in Canada,

have you ever been there to do any music work?

MP: Not really, but I have been working with people from Canada and I’m a big fan of

many of their acts; such as Alice Glass from Crystal Castles, Grimes and Drake. There

seems to be more that I’m hearing from Canada than I have in a long time, in fact one of

my artists just got signed to a record label in Canada on purpose, because they wanted to

start their fan-base in Canada rather than be in America. I thought that a very interesting

way of looking at things. I feel like Canada to be honest is a little bit of an untapped

possible sleeping giant maybe.

TMV: On your website it says that you’re completely open to working with non-“A-list”

talent, what do you often see in them that you don’t with more established names?

MP: It’s funny I mean, there’s A-list talent and there’s A-list fame, you know? They’re

not always the same, but the ones you know about have the A-list fame. Everyone I’ve

worked with, I’ve seen great things, but I have passed on people who are fairly well know

because I didn’t want them to make me look bad [laughs]. And then you get these people

out of nowhere who are amazing…really f—ing amazing, you just go oh my god! I get

called mostly by managers and labels, so I get a lot of these up and coming artists that

have talent, but they just need to be tightened up or they’re losing their voice on tour or

the label or the manager is insecure about the singer’s level of strength. Just because

they’re not A-list, doesn’t mean that I don’t want to be part of them, this is where the

artist development part of things go.

TMV: So even say if someone from a random small town, completely off the radar, but

they can contact you, they can pay the price, basically does pure talent just really grab

your attention?

MP: There’s no reason for me at this point to take anybody just because they can afford

the price, you know what I mean? I’ve gotten to a point where I can kind of, not quite

pick and choose, but I have to have a feeling about something, like I can tell this person

wants to sing more than anything in their life. They may never go anywhere

commercially but if that’s their desire, then I want to give them their dream, you know?

The other side of it is that people are really delusional and I won’t take them. So in a

sense what you’re saying is true, but I got to have a feeling that I’m serving somebody;

that I’m not just enabling somebody, or taking their money because they can afford me, I

have to feel like what I’m doing is really important to them, for some reason that is

important to me; which could even be a non-professional desire, like somebody just

wants to learn how to sing. I’ve had people contact me and say “hey man, all my life I’ve

wanted to sing, I just want to learn how to sing” and I’m into that, I think that’s cool.

I’ve been doing this so long that status is not the thing that makes me jump over hoops

and you know, and the lack of status is not going to make me go “Oh no, you’re not good

enough for somebody like myself”; I just have a different kind of process.

TVM: Just to end off here, how does a vocal coach help establish a vocalist’s identity?

MP: I think that…that’s a really good question by the way! I think that identity is the

most important thing about a singer, period. I always say to somebody, you can sing

great, you can sound so good singing, but if nobody likes you and what you’re doing as

an artist, like they don’t feel you or your identity, then it doesn’t matter if you’re a great

singer. They’ll go “oh well they’re a great singer but they’re boring.” Identity is the most

important thing, so I think a good vocal coach, and this is what I strive to do, is to all the

time be reinforcing that thing you see as their strongest vocal element that is having the

most connectivity and impact.

I myself being a musician and having played in front of big crowds, I know what it’s like

to connect with a crowd. There’s a certain kind of identity that goes with that which

makes it happen. You can kind of define it that everybody has their own way of doing

that, and I think that a vocal coach has to be smart enough, or empathic enough to know

what that person’s identity is and to never let them leave it. It’s like you’re always

necessarily giving it to them, like being “oh you should be this”, you got to see it because

there’s something a vocal coach can’t do, they can make you sound better but they can’t

give you what only an artist can do, which is be an artist, that’s their job, my job is to

filter all the crap out of there to make sure that it’s just pure. And then also, I am a

consultant too, like I’ll have long talks about this with all my clients, like this is what I’m

getting from you, is this what you want? So I have to make sure that their identity is

solid, and is exactly how they want to represent themselves.

]]>
349